“Were the Jews responsible for their own deaths in the Holocaust?” is now a serious question in the Republican primary

It’s not just Ben Carson anymore. Yesterday, Fox News contributor and Gun Owners of America head Larry Pratt went on the radio with Alan Colmes to talk about the idea that gun control is bad because Hitler did it.

When asked by Colmes if he agreed with Carson’s remarks, Pratt responded by saying, “Had the Jews had really good amounts of armament, they could have given the Nazis a real headache for a prolonged period of time, and in fact, had they had that determination to fight long before the [Warsaw] Ghetto, it might have been an entirely different story.”

Here’s the video, via Media Matters:

[iframe class=”video-embed” src=”https://mediamatters.org/embed/static/clips/2015/10/13/42518/foxnews-foxnewscom-20151012-pratt” width=”480″ height=”360″ frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen scrolling=”no”>]

Colmes (correctly) pointed out that Pratt’s claim about the Jews’ lack of “determination to fight” is “an extremely offensive position to a lot of Jews and also historically inaccurate.” Armed Jewish resistance to the Nazis long predates Warsaw; we don’t hear about it very much because it wasn’t very successful. When a small community takes on a standing army, the standing army wins. But Pratt, positively unbothered by these facts, doubled down, telling Colmes that his claim that the Holocaust might not have happened had the Jews not been such meek pansies in the 1930s is “only offensive to liberals…who don’t believe in self-defense.”

Larry Pratt speaking with Alan Colmes, screenshot via Media Matters

Larry Pratt speaking with Alan Colmes, screenshot via Media Matters

Well, no. It’s offensive to a lot of people. In fact, it’s only not offensive to gun rights absolutists who don’t believe in history. That just happens to be an incredibly loud and influential bloc of voters within the Republican base and conservative commentariat.

That these comments came from Larry Pratt is significant because his group, Gun Owners of America, endorsed Ted Cruz for president after he became the only candidate who returned their issues survey. Cruz has not yet gone on the record regarding Carson’s comments about gun control’s contribution to the Holocaust, but these comments from Pratt should force him (and by extension the rest of the field) to do so. And you know what that means:

“Were the Jews’ responsible for their own deaths during World War II?” is now a serious question in the Republican primary. The idea is clearly not just one of Ben Carson’s many zany conspiracy theories; it’s borderline mainstream within the conservative base, as evidenced by the spirited defense it’s received in the conservative media. This means that polling firms are going to have to start asking GOP primary voters whether they think gun control is like Hitler, and it means that journalists are going to have to start asking the rest of the Republican field the same.

I’d expect some really, really uncomfortable answers.

Jon Green graduated from Kenyon College with a B.A. in Political Science and high honors in Political Cognition. He worked as a field organizer for Congressman Tom Perriello in 2010 and a Regional Field Director for President Obama's re-election campaign in 2012. Jon writes on a number of topics, but pays especially close attention to elections, religion and political cognition. Follow him on Twitter at @_Jon_Green, and on Google+. .

Share This Post

8 Responses to ““Were the Jews responsible for their own deaths in the Holocaust?” is now a serious question in the Republican primary”

  1. Hue-Man says:

    There is something sad about TeaPartiers being so naive to think that any possible gun they may possess would be able to withstand the largest military force on the planet. A single drone could wipe out their neighborhood before they even realized they needed to reach for their Colt! Several jets could wipe out an entire city in minutes. And that’s before even mentioning bombing them back to the Middle Ages with nuclear weapons. What purpose does an 18th century militia serve in the 21st century?

    European Jews were in a similar situation, confronting the strongest military force in Europe. Maybe no drones but tanks, aircraft, and well-trained soldiers facing off against untrained civilians with their children and elderly relations. It was no accident the Blitzkrieg was able to overrun entire nations in mere weeks.

  2. The_Fixer says:

    Yes, they prefer to work with males, especially males who want to speak for females.

    But like people of color, they need a few in their stable to “prove” that they’re not misogynist and racist.

    In the end, though, they’d rather that the whole lot of them, and the inconvenient problems that they present, would just disappear.

  3. Indigo says:

    It’s much easier to make up stuff up abouut the Holocaust than it is to confront the issues of poverty, health care, and the financial crisis. It’s possible the Republicans are genuinely stupid but it’s perfectly clear that they’re way too lazy to work with the issues the public is confronting or to govern.

  4. BeccaM says:

    Not only is this no longer fringe stuff anymore — it’s become part of the mandatory party orthodoxy.

  5. BeccaM says:

    The list of people and groups the Republicans seem not to care about offending just keeps getting longer and longer…

    I guess it might be easier at this point simply to note that if you’re not a white, radically conservative, and fundamentalist Christian (and preferably male), the Republicans have just one message: “F*ck off.”

  6. Houndentenor says:

    About a week before this Carson comment I saw a few versions of a facebook meme claiming that the Nazis banned guns just weeks before rounding up all the Jews and comparing that to Obama wanting to ban all the guns implying that the next step would be to round up all the Christians. It’s so absurd as to be almost funny if people weren’t serious. And they are. I’ve been telling people how batshit crazy the Teavangelicals really are and how I’ve been hearing this shit for decades. Do y’all finally believe me? None of this is new. It’s just that people on the coasts could ignore this as the fringe. The fringe doesn’t get to the top 3-4 in the polls. This isn’t the fringe any more. This IS the GOP.

  7. Baal says:

    I certainly hopes it comes up at their next debate.

  8. fry1laurie says:

    “I know, we’ll get Jews to vote for us if we mock their struggles in the Holocaust and blame them for Hitler!”

    To quote Charlie Pierce, “Once again, I despair the rebranding.”

© 2020 AMERICAblog Media, LLC. All rights reserved. · Entries RSS