After months of appeasement, GOP candidates finally say Trump’s gone too far

Donald Trump’s call for banning all Muslims from entering the United States — even citizens who are currently abroad — has (finally) flipped a switch in the Republican primary, giving his opponents something they feel comfortable attacking him over. As every Republican candidate was inevitably asked yesterday whether they agreed with Trump that it was time to keep all Muslims out of the country “until our country’s representatives can figure out what’s going on,” candidates from Jeb Bush to Ben Carson distanced themselves from Trump, calling his idea out for being the unconstitutional, un-American piece of nativist trash that it is.

Lindsey Graham and Carly Fiorina both called the idea “dangerous.” Chris Cristie called it “ridiculous.” Jeb Bush called it “unhinged.” John Kasich called it “outrageous.”

Trump’s more serious (as measured by poll standing) opponents, however, weren’t quite so critical. Marco Rubio merely said that he disagreed with Trump’s ban on Muslims entering the United States. Ted Cruz didn’t even go that far, simply saying it’s “not my policy.” Ben Carson endorsed the idea of monitoring everyone who visits the United States, but said that he opposed “being selective on one’s religion.”

Donald Trump, via Gage Skidmore / Flickr

Donald Trump, via Gage Skidmore / Flickr

But while even that is, by the current campaign’s standards, a pretty major break from Trump for the GOP field, let’s be clear, these guys are in absolutely no position to talk. For all of their newfound respect for American values, practically every Republican candidate has, at some point in the last month, bear-hugged the general concept of what Trump’s proposing. That being the case, Trump’s willingness to go there is the more honest move — internally consistent with the parallel universe he has created in the Republican primary.

You’ll remember that Jeb Bush and Ted Cruz have both endorsed explicit religious tests for Syrian refugees entering the country that would only permit Christians to resettle. This is only slightly less-obviously unconstitutional than a blanket ban on Muslims, and is arguably harder to implement. Marco Rubio is actually to Donald Trump’s right when it comes to monitoring Muslims — citizens and non-citizens alike — who are already in the United States. Rand Paul has already introduced a bill in the Senate that would suspend all immigration from Syria and 30 other (predominantly Muslim-majority) countries.

All of these proposals send the same message: Muslims are a problem, and keeping Muslims out or sic-ing Big Brother on them while they are here is the solution. Banning them all from entering — feasible or no — is nothing more than the simplest formulation of the entire Republican Party’s core belief.

Which is why this isn’t an unfair summary of conservatives’ reaction to Trump’s position:

Conservatives don’t all agree with Trump on the merits, but after attack after attack on minority group after minority group has gone unanswered, the idea that this is finally the hill that Republican candidates are willing to die on seems odd and phony, to say the least. Donald Trump called most Mexicans rapists, and the GOP field said nothing. Donald Trump suggested that he got difficult questions at a debate because one of the moderators was menstruating, and the GOP field said nothing. Donald Trump called Jews money-grubbing wheelers and dealers, and the GOP field said nothing. Donald Trump explicitly endorsed torture and said that we need to bomb the families of suspected terrorists, and the GOP field said nothing. Donald Trump said that we might need special IDs for monitoring Muslims, and the GOP field shrugged their shoulders. Only now that he’s distilled their core religio-native belief into one simple sentence — “ban ALL the Muslims!” — have they perked up.

What part of “we’re going to have to do certain things that were frankly unthinkable a year ago” did they not understand?

As Erick Erickson wrote yesterday, clarifying that he disagrees with Trump on the merits but thinks the proposal is brilliant politics, for the GOP candidates to call Trump “unhinged” over these comments comes off not only as an attack on Trump, but as an attack on his voters. What Erickson didn’t say, because he’s complicit in this, is that Trump’s voters completely agree with him on the merits because they’ve been told that the average Muslim is dangerous and bad for fourteen years. That’s why it’s been so tough to go after him over these last five months.

For the party that is borderline obsessed with Chamberlain references, they should have known how far appeasement was going to get them.

Jon Green graduated from Kenyon College with a B.A. in Political Science and high honors in Political Cognition. He worked as a field organizer for Congressman Tom Perriello in 2010 and a Regional Field Director for President Obama's re-election campaign in 2012. Jon writes on a number of topics, but pays especially close attention to elections, religion and political cognition. Follow him on Twitter at @_Jon_Green, and on Google+. .

Share This Post

14 Responses to “After months of appeasement, GOP candidates finally say Trump’s gone too far”

  1. Genevieve Rodriguez says:

    .❝my neighbor’s mother is making $98 HOURLY on the internet❞….A few days ago new McLaren F1 subsequent after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, $17k Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a day ..with extra open doors & weekly paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over $87, p/h.Learn More right Here….
    ➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportMedia/GetPaid/$97hourly… ❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦

  2. Don Chandler says:

    What I’ve seen is Trump starts it all and the rest follow. Some balk a bit and then see the futility of standing up to Trump and his following. But Trump’s bunch are loyal–a completely dishonest bunch, but loyal. Go to Breitbart or Newsmax. They are so fanatic. Even Cruz is criticized for being not radical enough.

  3. AnitaMann says:

    Yet they have not said they won’t support him in the general. Profiles in courage, not.

  4. BeccaM says:

    So is much of the Republican party in general. Add Trump’s supporters to those supporting the other candidates who are basically supporting the same positions, just phrased slightly less offensively, and we’re talking a majority of their base now.

  5. Tarnia Sand says:

    Agree with Jeb Bush on one thing; ‘Trump is unhinged’.

  6. Tarnia Sand says:

    Trump’s entire campaign has been entirely about ‘fear’. Fear of Mexicans Muslims anyone that disagrees with him gets taken out of reach physically or humiliated via his twitter account shamed in national media. Media needs to holster a lot of the blame as they report every tidbit.

  7. BeccaM says:

    I’m not so sure. Remember Dubya, the Dim Son, where there was no way he was going to win because he’d been such a failure as governor and couldn’t pour piss out of a boot if the instructions were written on the heel?

  8. BeccaM says:

    “(O)nly Trump has the bravery” to basically say he’s terrified of all Muslims, and he wants the rest of America to be as afraid as him?

    Well, we always knew that hyper-nationalistic xenophobia was an essential feature of a would-be fascist dictator. Here, we get to see the ‘phobia’ part in stark relief.

  9. FLL says:

    Trump may be looking to head up a third party, which would be the equivalent of Le Pen’s National Front in France or the UK Independence Party. That seems to me to be the only logical conclusion to the trajectory of Trump’s rhetoric. This would split the already atrophied Republican base. I just can’t see establishment Republicans (what’s left of them) accepting Trump’s nomination for the Republican Party. It might be a three-way race in 2016.

  10. Demosthenes says:

    Donald Trump will never be president. If the GOP is crazy enough to nominate him, it will result in a historic Democratic landslide.

  11. Demosthenes says:

    According to campaign insiders, he Donald’s statement calling for the banning of Muslims was originally published in German and referred to “der Juden”.

  12. goulo says:

    History shows plenty of fascist demagogues indeed were undone by their own hubris… but unfortunately only AFTER they gained office, and they took their countries down with them. :(

  13. Don Chandler says:

    Trump’s followers are radicalized.

  14. Quilla says:

    Choking on his own hubris.

    The countdown begins.

    Who wants popcorn?

© 2021 AMERICAblog Media, LLC. All rights reserved. · Entries RSS