NAACP challenges Alabama’s voter ID law as racially discriminatory, citing DMV closures

The NAACP Legal Defense Fund announced today that they have filed a lawsuit challenging Alabama’s voter ID law in federal court.

As the group wrote in a press release:

Anti-voter ID protest, via Creative Common

Anti-voter ID protest, via Creative Common

The complaint alleges that Alabama enacted a photo ID law that the State’s own initial analysis showed would disfranchise over a quarter of a million registered voters, a disproportionate number of whom are Black and Latino, in violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The photo ID law is one of three intentionally discriminatory measures passed by the 2011-12 Alabama Legislature. The other two — the State’s legislative redistricting plans and House Bill 56 — have already been successfully challenged in federal court. The lawsuit also comes shortly after Alabama’s decision to largely close 31 DMV offices, which has made it much more difficult for Black and Latino voters to get driver’s licenses, the most common form of photo ID.

The complaint includes the story of a nearly 18-year-old high school student who will be unable to vote in the 2016 elections because she does not have a photo ID. The closest DMV office to her is open only one day a month, and she would need to travel more than 40 miles round-trip to a DMV office with more generous hours. But, she has never driven and there is no public transportation from her hometown to either DMV office.

The LDF noted that Alabama’s law was passed before the Supreme Court struck down the Voting Rights Act’s preclearance requirements, but that the state delayed implementation of the law specifically to avoid federal scrutiny. On the day after the Supreme Court’s ruling, the state announced the law would go into effect, suggesting that it did not trust that the law would survive federal scrutiny as to whether it was racially discriminatory.

Furthermore, the LDF has warned the state that portions of the law are being interpreted as an illegal “voucher” requirement, which is banned under parts of the Voting Rights Act that remain standing.

Furthermore, the state has rejected suggestions for changes in the law’s implementation that would lessen its effects. For example, as the LDF notes, the state denied requests from voting rights advocates to include public housing IDs in the list of acceptable forms of identification. 71 percent of the state’s public housing residents are black, compared to 25 percent of the state’s overall population.

Alabama’s is but the latest voter ID law to face court challenges. Lawsuits are currently pending in states ranging from Virginia to Wisconsin in advance of the 2016 election. Texas’s was recently struck down in federal appeals court, and could soon find itself before the Supreme Court. While most voter ID cases hinge on whether the court applies the disparate impact test, which invalidates laws that have racially discriminatory effects regardless of the laws’ intent, this case may not need to. The way in which Alabama has gone about implementing its voter ID law suggests that the law has been implemented with racially discriminatory intent. That should be enough to knock it down.

We’ll see how the court decides.


Jon Green graduated from Kenyon College with a B.A. in Political Science and high honors in Political Cognition. He worked as a field organizer for Congressman Tom Perriello in 2010 and a Regional Field Director for President Obama's re-election campaign in 2012. Jon writes on a number of topics, but pays especially close attention to elections, religion and political cognition. Follow him on Twitter at @_Jon_Green, and on Google+. .

Share This Post

7 Responses to “NAACP challenges Alabama’s voter ID law as racially discriminatory, citing DMV closures”

  1. Mike_in_the_Tundra says:

    You really didn’t bother to read your own links, did you? Canada will accept such things as a prescription bottle, debit card, or utility bill as an ID.

  2. Nicholas A Kocal says:

    Are you just playing stupid? The DMV is the only place that produce the IDs. The courthouses do not issue IDs. You can can the required documents at the courthouse (for a FEE, can you say poll tax). But you still then need to take that documentation to the DMV to get the ID.

  3. William D. Fleming says:

    I have researched this fully and to save my life can not see how the new laws will deprive anyone of their right to vote. We don’t have to go to a DMV to get an ID; We need only go to the courthouse. Registrars there have acces to state archives and are instructed to assist applicants to obtain the needed document. There is even a mobile unit which travels the county, registering people.

    Showing an ID card to vote sounds totally reasonable to me. Such cards are required in Mexico, Canada, and many other countries.

    VOTER ID REQUIREMENTS
    Canada:
    http://elections.ca/content2.aspx?section=id&document=index&lang=e

    Mexico:
    http://www.snopes.com/politics/ballot/mexicovote.asp

    General:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/voter-id-proponents-point-to-laws-in-other-countries/2012/07/12/gJQAVlGCfW_blog.html

    It will be interesting to see the outcome of the lawsuit. I predict that it will fall flat.

  4. ComradeRutherford says:

    Gotta keep those Democrats from voting somehow. Republicans know they can never win on the merits of their arguments.

  5. I have just getting $ 8765 within one month.I am connected with a business entity that outsource online jobs . I heard about it last year and I have made such great cash . It is great and I am just so happy to have that option ……. Look here for details …

    ===>>> Visit Website in my РŔoŦĨĹĔ

    64

  6. The_Fixer says:

    Wisconsin is one of those states using this template to deny people their voting rights – demand a photo ID, close DMV offices and reduce the hours of some.

    I’ve said this before about other dirty tricks the Republican elected politicians have pulled, but will say it again: This is a coordinated campaign to deny people of their legal rights. It’s criminal.

    An organized group of criminals acting in concert are in a conspiracy. This is RICO territory. In a sane society, this would be investigated, grand juries would be called, there would be trials, and some people would be convicted and go to jail.

    Of course, sane is hardly the way to describe a society that treats Donald Trump and his ilk with any kind of regard.

  7. BeccaM says:

    Republicans can’t win on their policies, but they do know they have roughly 30% of the electorate who will vote for them no matter what, even if their candidates were to be caught torturing kittens and puppies.

    These voter ID measures, registration restrictions, and polling place shenanigans, coupled with what appears to be a concerted effort to steal elections through vote count tampering, are all there to ensure it’s their 30% base and only them who get to “elect” our government.

    I mean, could it be more blatant? Step 1: Require a voter ID issued by motor vehicle departments, and require documentation that some minorities are statistically less likely to be able to produce than the GOPer’s base. Step 2: Close the MVDs closest to the targeted populations.

© 2020 AMERICAblog Media, LLC. All rights reserved. · Entries RSS